APP Law Firm Challenges The Inconsistency of “is considered as an international arbitration award” phrase of Arbitration Act

We challenge the constitutionality of Article 1 number 9 of the Arbitration Law, specifically the phrase “is considered as an international arbitration award,” on the grounds that it is inconsistent. This phrase has led to uncertainty due to the lack of a clear definition of what constitutes an international arbitration award. By filing this petition with the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, we aim to ensure that the government provides a precise definition, eliminating the ambiguity surrounding this phrase in the Arbitration Law and will prevent future debates regarding the definition of an international arbitration award.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *