{"id":360,"date":"2024-11-20T07:36:51","date_gmt":"2024-11-20T07:36:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/applawfirm.net\/Site\/?p=360"},"modified":"2024-11-20T07:36:51","modified_gmt":"2024-11-20T07:36:51","slug":"app-law-firm-challenges-the-inconsistency-of-is-considered-as-an-international-arbitration-award-phrase-of-arbitration-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/applawfirm.net\/Site\/2024\/11\/20\/app-law-firm-challenges-the-inconsistency-of-is-considered-as-an-international-arbitration-award-phrase-of-arbitration-act\/","title":{"rendered":"APP Law Firm Challenges The Inconsistency of &#8220;is considered as an international arbitration award&#8221; phrase of Arbitration Act"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>We challenge the constitutionality of Article 1 number 9 of the Arbitration Law, specifically the phrase &#8220;is considered as an international arbitration award,&#8221; on the grounds that it is inconsistent. This phrase has led to uncertainty due to the lack of a clear definition of what constitutes an international arbitration award. By filing this petition with the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, we aim to ensure that the government provides a precise definition, eliminating the ambiguity surrounding this phrase in the Arbitration Law and will prevent future debates regarding the definition of an international arbitration\u00a0award.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Sidang Perkara Nomor 100\/PUU-XXII\/2024. Senin, 14 Oktober 2024.\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/0hwpaeJmnAs?start=44&#038;feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We challenge the constitutionality of Article 1 number 9 of the Arbitration Law, specifically the phrase &#8220;is considered as an international arbitration award,&#8221; on the grounds that it is inconsistent. This phrase has led to uncertainty due to the lack of a clear definition of what constitutes an international arbitration award. By filing this petition&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/applawfirm.net\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/360"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/applawfirm.net\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/applawfirm.net\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/applawfirm.net\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/applawfirm.net\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=360"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/applawfirm.net\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/360\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":361,"href":"http:\/\/applawfirm.net\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/360\/revisions\/361"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/applawfirm.net\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=360"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/applawfirm.net\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=360"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/applawfirm.net\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=360"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}